The state-by-state picture this page has been missing is now three states clearer: Telangana, Karnataka and Maharashtra's own RERA Rules all prescribe the identical "State Bank of India highest Marginal Cost of Lending Rate plus two per cent" formula this calculator already models for Rajasthan — not a coincidence you can extrapolate to every state, but a confirmed match for these three specifically. Before running any state's number, check the project was even required to register: projects under 500 sq m or 8 units are exempt from RERA altogether, and Section 18 only protects buyers of registered projects.
Telangana, Karnataka and Maharashtra: independently confirmed, same formula
Telangana's own gazetted Rules state the identical formula this page already models for Rajasthan: "shall be highest Marginal Cost of Lending Rate of State Bank of India plus two per cent" (Rule 15, Telangana Real Estate Rules, 2017, applicable to projects whose building permission was approved on or after 1 January 2017). Karnataka's Rules, Rule 16, use the same wording almost verbatim: "shall be the State Bank of India highest marginal cost of lending rate plus two percent". And Maharashtra's Rules, Rule 18, made under Section 84 of the central Act, state it a third time: "shall be the State Bank of India highest Marginal Cost of Lending Rate plus two percent", with the same fallback clause Rajasthan's Rule 17 carries — if SBI stops publishing MCLR, the rate is replaced by whatever benchmark lending rate SBI fixes for the general public.
That is three states verified here — Telangana, Karnataka and Maharashtra — using the same benchmark and spread this calculator models for Rajasthan, which is useful for a MahaRERA or K-RERA order specifically, but it is not license to assume a fifth, unchecked state matches. This page's own data file already documents why: West Bengal's Rule 17 prescribes SBI's prime lending rate, not its MCLR, a different benchmark entirely. Use the calculator's rate field to override the default for any state whose Rules you have not personally checked.
Before you calculate: was the project even required to register?
Section 18 compensation is a remedy that attaches to a RERA-registered project. The Act itself carves out an exemption: "no registration of the real estate project shall be required — where the area of land proposed to be developed does not exceed five hundred square meters or the number of apartments proposed to be developed does not exceed eight inclusive of all phases". A small standalone building on a sub-500-sq-m plot, or a project of eight units or fewer, may legally have no RERA registration at all — which means no Section 18 interest claim through the RERA authority for that project, whatever the delay. Check your project's RERA registration number before assuming this calculator's output is a claim you can file; an unregistered small project routes any dispute through consumer courts or civil courts under different law entirely.
The 10% cap on pre-agreement collections — why the 'amount paid' field has a ceiling
The amount this calculator asks you to enter — what you actually paid the builder — is itself bounded by another section of the same Act. Section 13(1) bars a promoter from accepting "a sum more than ten per cent of the cost of the apartment, plot, or building...as an advance payment or an application fee, from a person without first entering into a written agreement for sale". If your pre-agreement payment already exceeds 10% of the announced cost, the builder collected it in breach of Section 13, a separate violation from any possession delay — worth raising alongside a Section 18 claim, not instead of it, since the two sections address different promoter obligations.
Your home loan interest does not pause while you wait
Section 18 interest runs against the builder, on the money you paid the builder. It has no effect on a separate loan you took from a bank to pay for the flat — if that loan is floating-rate, it has been required since 1 October 2019 to track an external benchmark such as the repo rate, and it keeps resetting on the bank's own schedule regardless of how the possession dispute is going. A buyer who has been paying pre-EMI on a home loan through a multi-year delay is carrying two separate interest streams that never net against each other automatically: what the bank charges you, and what the builder may eventually owe you under Section 18. Any settlement or authority order should be checked against both, not assumed to cancel one against the other.
Methodology
State-rule quotations are read directly from each state's own gazetted RERA Rules PDF; the central Act's Section 13/18/3 text is read from the Act as mirrored by UP-RERA's own PDF. No interest rate, cap or exemption threshold is stated without a direct quote from the cited text.
Sources
- Government of Telangana — Telangana Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2017 — accessed 2026-09-21
- Government of Karnataka — Karnataka Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2017 — accessed 2026-09-21
- Government of Maharashtra — Maharashtra Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2017 — accessed 2026-09-21
- The Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 — Sections 3 and 13 — accessed 2026-09-21
- Reserve Bank of India — External benchmark linking of floating-rate retail loans — accessed 2026-09-21